What distinguishes strategic nuclear weapons from tactical nuclear weapons?

Strategic nuclear weapons are specifically designed for long-range attacks and typically have a significant destructive capability, aimed at targeting large-scale, strategic objectives such as cities, military bases, or critical infrastructure. The intention behind their deployment is to deter adversaries through the threat of overwhelming retaliation, which plays a crucial role in the doctrine of nuclear deterrence.

In contrast, tactical nuclear weapons are intended for shorter-range use and are generally deployed on the battlefield or for specific military operations. They can support conventional forces or be used to achieve immediate military objectives, and their yields tend to be lower compared to strategic weapons. The distinction is important because it influences military strategy, planning, and deployment considerations in the context of nuclear warfare.

The other options either mischaracterize the purpose and deployment scope of these types of weapons or confuse their operational roles within military strategy. The clear definition regarding their long-range versus battlefield applications reinforces the fundamental differences that guide strategic military doctrines.